Sunday, May 10, 2009

Can't Anyone Hear Us??



It seems that, no matter how many times we say it and in how many ways we say it, the ones who need to hear this just can't seem to pick it up. Here goes, one more time...NO WHERE, IN ANYTHING WE WERE COERCED INTO SIGNING WHEN WE WERE YOUNG, UNMARRIED MOTHERS CAUGHT IN THE EMS/BSE WEB, DID IT SAY ANYTHING WHATSOEVER ABOUT GUARANTEEING OUR 'PRIVACY!'

The whole argument given by the closed-records proponents seems to be built around protection of the natural mother's privacy. That is just so much reeking manure! Guaranteed privacy was for the adopters....not the mothers. We were supposed to go away, keep our loss a secret and, if the wishes of the adopters were granted, die young.

Too many of us took those injunctions to never speak of our experience to heart for too many years. There is a very small minority of mothers from that era who still operate from shame and secrecy. But they do NOT speak for the bulk of us anymore than the, so-called, experts do. In other words, ask US. Don't ask the Evan B. Donaldson Institute or the social workers or adoption attorneys and anyone who has adopted. They are going to cover their asses and lie.

The most ridiculous aspect of this whole thing is the fact that these people are trying to control free association between ADULTS!! My daughter's adoptress tried to make me back off after my daughter found me. I answered her by letting her know that my daughter was 33 years old and it would be her decision as to whether or not to pursue a relationship. And here I thought that the Civil War took care of this ownership of human beings thingy.

The legal machine in this country, the courts and the judiciary have played God so long that I think they actually believe they should have the power to create virgins out of young girls who have given birth and something superior to the blood bond when they "make a family." Puh-leeze, people! You can twist and pull at that bond, but it never breaks. Unfortunately, it does distort and causes unbelievable pain.

SMAAC and other groups like it are not about what happens after adoption. We are concerned with what happened to us from the time we became pregnant until surrender. Some of us are finding out that the period between surrender to the agencies and the actual adoption was a time when we were the only parents recognized. It was a time when, had we been told and received the proper support, we could have taken our children back. The lies we were told are legion. The truth-twisting of today is nothing more than the original liars trying to paste Kevlar to their quivering butt cheeks.

Stop blaming mothers and start opening the records for us all. It's time for the secrets and lies to be laid to rest.

And a word of advice to a few of you adopted people; It really scares a lot of the moms, who are still traumatized by the treatment we received when we lost you, to read the vile and hateful things many of you post about natural mothers. We DO have a right to protect our peace of mind and to protect our personal safety. Get mad at the right people and stop raking your mothers over the coals. Just a suggestion.

5 comments:

  1. Anonymous10:45 PM

    I don't know why this is so hard to understand:
    The records were sealed at the time of the adoption finalization and not at the time of the surrender. Had the surrender occured and the adoption NOT taken place the records would never been sealed.

    Had the surrender occured and the adoption taken place BUT the child was returned into foster care for an adoption dissolution the sealed records would have been re-opened.

    Now if that isn't enough to prove mothers were never promised privacy nor were the ones who asked for it, nothing will.

    Leslie B

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am beginning to think that common sense and logic are not a part of our lawmakers' agendas, Leslie. BTW, THANKS for the wonderful graphic.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous12:12 PM

    Even if adoptee's acknowledged the records were sealed upon adoption. They still wouldn't want to admit that the adopter's "part" in taking a baby.

    Adoptee's have to many issues in regard to loyalties, with their adopter's and I think that is the reason that they aren't listened to by legislatures etc. I have heard one to many adoptee's claim the happy adoptee card while wanting to seach at the same time.

    This shows ambivelance, and legislatures, listen to the two sided talk and decide there are just to many happy adoptee's to rock the whole adoption boat. Even the ones there claim, happiness, while wanting to know the truth, and those two factors just don't go together. If one is happy with adopter why bother???? Why would anyone want to know? After all their life was perfect.

    ReplyDelete
  4. ""Adoptee's have to many issues in regard to loyalties, with their adopter's and I think that is the reason that they aren't listened to by legislatures etc. I have heard one to many adoptee's claim the happy adoptee card while wanting to seach at the same time.""

    ""This shows ambivelance, and legislatures, listen to the two sided talk and decide there are just to many happy adoptee's to rock the whole adoption boat. Even the ones there claim, happiness, while wanting to know the truth, and those two factors just don't go together. If one is happy with adopter why bother???? Why would anyone want to know? After all their life was perfect.""

    I think you may be on to something...I would like to hear from adopted people who have appeared in these bill sessions and what were the reasons they gave for wanting Open Records and how their reasons were met by the legislators listenting to their 'reasons'.

    ReplyDelete
  5. May 13, '09


    Hi! Yes, I agree, the people who

    control the adoption networks--

    corrupt lawyers, crooked social

    workers, wilfully blind

    politicians, money-hungry doctors,

    fire-and-brimstone preachers, etc.-

    -now try to oppressively control

    the free association between the

    adults of mothers who were forced

    to terminate their/our parental

    rights to our natural-born

    children and those now-adult kids

    who would want to communicate with

    us. It's always about the social

    workers, lawyers et al wanting to

    maintain paranoid control.

    Most often THEY committed so many

    crimes and tortious offenses in

    stealing our children they're

    deathly afraid to let anyone

    including adult adoptees see the

    false information they (the social

    workers, lawyers, etc.) wrote in

    our records because they know,

    even many years after the fact,

    that we often would have grounds

    to sue. And judges also

    discourage granting access to the

    records of adult adoptees never

    mind their/our biological

    children. Judges are paranoid

    that even one case will "open the

    flood gates" to huge amounts

    of "falsification of records"

    cases being filed by natural

    mothers and same said fathers.

    We all know that lawyers and

    social workers like the ones

    involved in my and my son's matter

    David McConkie of Kirton &

    McConkie and Colleen Burnham of

    Children's Aid Society of Utah all

    lied about us. From the beginning

    these corrupt social workers and

    lawyers lied, about us, they

    initiated and maintained the whole

    adoption matter by lying about us

    and writing false information

    about in the records. Even the

    lawyers and social workers know

    this.

    Now they rant and rave

    because they no longer can force

    us natural mothers to keep silent

    and enable them (the laweyrs and

    social workers etc.) to continue

    getting away with their adoption

    fraudulence. Even these folks

    know it's just plain wrong to make

    people like natural parents and

    adut adoptees beg and plead and

    grovel for morsels of information

    that should be ours if we at least

    want to purchase it. This is so

    cruel and ungodly!

    But then sustaining the whole

    adoption rackets on the backs of

    natural mothers worsens our

    anguish. Continually inflicting

    DEFAMATION on us by calling us

    names like whores, tramps, etc.

    and also further victimizing us

    with DISCRIMINATION by denying us,

    and then inflicting FASIFICATION

    (corruption) OF RECORDS upon us by

    erasing correct information and

    adding wrong data in our records,

    as well as subjecting us to

    SEGREGATION by subordinating us to

    "lower" classes of citizens ALL

    contributes to adoption social

    workers etc. sustaining the whole

    adoption system on the backs of

    natural mothers. We're the ones

    they call whores, not our

    childrens' biological fathers,

    we're the ones they stigmatize as

    tramps, we're the ones who are

    discriminated against and further

    deprived, and we the natural

    mothers are the ones in any given

    adoption matter who

    are "invisibalized" and so

    silenced and therefore segregated

    to comprise a "lower" social class

    of citizenry.

    It should NOT be a requirement of

    re-union for a natural mother to

    participate in any event(s)

    relative to her adoption child-

    loss. Too many people also deny

    us natural mothers if we're not in

    reunion. That should NOT be a pre-

    requisite to participation.

    Thank you.
    Kathy Caudle
    Natural Mother

    ReplyDelete

All comments monitored all of the time. Blogger reserves the right to reject argumentative or hostile or derisive comments. I ain't no fun at all.