Sunday, October 03, 2010

Unmitigated Gall and Execrable Rationalizations

Musing Mother also posted this bit on Machiavellian Tactics and propaganda and twisted stats to encourage social engineering. I copied it here so that everyone who doesn't think that the industry is out to brainwash and coerce single mothers and who ignore facts while justifying injustice can see the proof, no matter what blog they read. This is what they really think they should do. They wrote it, I didn't.

 So, it does seem that Mr."Chucky" Johnson, in lock-step with and using the words of Mr. Tom Atwood, and his adoption posse, the NCFA, DO believe that single women and less affluent people don't have the right to parent and that all should be done to "educate" (subtly coerce) mothers into surrender of their newborns. Therefore, he presented the manifesto written by Tom Atwood, NCFA's former president, almost as if his own. Oh...and they lobbed the "bitter bomb" as well. It's easy to dismiss our righteous indignation that way, ya know?

And, when citing the increasing number of foster children in the system (at the time...the number has actually decreased as of this year), he had ignored the avid child-snatching of state DSS agents who ignore the edict that family reunification should be a primary concern. No, Chucky/Tom insinuates that the number of children who were in the foster system was directly related to single mothers choosing to keep and parent their own babies. There is also the fact that Mr. and Mrs. Entitled Adopter don't want these older kids with a history and problems. They want that womb-fresh baby, preferably born to the homecoming queen/class valedictorian.

I have some questions for Mr. Chuck Johnson (who is a medium and channels Tom Atwood, still living, I believe,) and the Industry he supports.

HOW DARE YOU MAKE THIS JUDGEMENT? HOW DARE YOU INTIMATE THAT MOTHERS ARE UNFIT JUST BECAUSE THEY ARE SINGLE? HOW DARE YOU IGNORE THE VOICES OF ADULT ADOPTED PEOPLE AND MOTHERS WHOSE CHILDREN WERE APPROPRIATED FOR ADOPTION FOR THE SAKE OF THE BOTTOM LINE AND ELITIST SOCIAL ENGINEERING? WHO GAVE YOU THE INSIGHT INTO WHAT WE ARE FEELING SO MUCH THAT YOU CAN LABEL IT?

Oh, and that's not bitterness, Tommy/Chuck. That's boiling, blistering anger. That's the righteous indignation of huge numbers of mothers and their adult children who have been adversely affected by this crap you spew so vigorously. You pompous pundits have denied, in one page of tripe, the truth of the experience of so many. Who died and made you the arbiter of who should and should not be allowed to parent their own children?

Dear Reader, You might have to increase your screen zoom level in order to read this piece of elitist garbage. This also comes with a warning. Keep a barf bag or bucket handy.



CHUCKY AND YOUR PREDECESSOR,  YOU DON'T KNOW JACK SH**!!

3 comments:

Sandy Young said...

I posted that last night because I couldn't figure out a better way to make sure that it was visible so I scanned it into my computer and posted it on my blog because I was too lazy to refind the link.

To me that amounts to a manifesto on the part of the NCFA, delivered by Tom Atwood and passed on as a legacy mandate to Chuck Johnson. In there they lay out the focus of their intention, and they pretty much enumerate how they intend to proceed and STILL people are shocked at their gall! Why? They said they were going to do it! Why be surprised when they do?n They are despicable!

Thanks for adding this. I think it is critical that people see what's in store, and they have a limited readership at the NCFA...remember the old saw, "Keep your friends close and your enemies closer" and in this instance READ WHAT THEY HAVE TO SAY!

Robin said...

I wish it could be plastered all over the net. Seeing it in this form, rather than the excerpts I had read before, made me see 20 shades of red.

Von said...

No sorry couldn't bring myself to read anything, even a receipt by Chucky.Wonder what his salary is?